Robinhood Chain Daily Onchain Brief
Executive summary
Robinhood Chain reports a total DeFi TVL between $1.13B and $1.14B [3, 4], dominated by $1.05B in circulating stablecoins [4] alongside major lending and DEX activity across Morpho Blue, Steakhouse Financial, and Uniswap [4]. Core network liquidity is anchored by WETH and USDG, which each registered $107.06M in 24-hour volume [2, 3]. Recent DEX activity is led by high-turnover new pairs such as NMS, ETH, and GFG launched via automated launchpads and Uniswap pools within the past 24 hours [1], accompanied by active trading in ecosystem meme tokens and wrapped synthetic equity pairs [2, 3].
- Total DeFi TVL
- $1.13B
- Circulating Stablecoins
- $1.05B
- 24h Volume (WETH / USDG each)
- $107.06M
DeFi totals and network metrics
Robinhood Chain DeFi TVL stands at $1.13B per DefiLlama data (+0.63% over 7 days, +11.53% over 30 days) and $1.14B in Codex aggregate tracking [3, 4]. Circulating stablecoins represent $1.05B of this capital [4]. Network base fee is quoted at 0.02 gwei at block 98,021,232 [3].
Lending and risk-curation platforms account for the largest protocol balances, led by Morpho Blue ($617.07M) and Steakhouse Financial ($544.23M) [4]. Because risk curators and vault strategies deposit directly into lending markets, individual protocol TVLs overlap and sum to more than the chain-wide total [4].
| Protocol | Category | TVL | 7d Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Morpho Blue | Lending | $617.07M | +2.36% |
| Steakhouse Financial | Risk Curators | $544.23M | +2.84% |
| Uniswap V4 | Dexs | $181.53M | +11.32% |
| Lighter Robinhood Perps | Derivatives | $115.16M | +2.99% |
| Uniswap V3 | Dexs | $92.58M | +3.30% |
| Arcus Perps | Derivatives | $63.89M | +3.86% |
| Fables | Dexs | $27.70M | -15.08% |
| Grove Finance | Onchain Capital Allocator | $15.11M | +2.68% |
Trending tokens
The trending rankings on Robinhood Chain are led by core liquidity assets WETH and USDG, followed by native ecosystem tokens like PONS and the recently deployed NMS [3]. Wrapped equities and tracker tokens such as QQQ, NVDA, and TSLA also retain high liquidity and active holder bases [2, 3].
| Token | Price | 24h Vol | Liquidity | Holders | Age | Contract |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WETH | $2,300 | $107.06M | $59.70M | 611.9K | 115d | 0x0bd7d308f8e1639fab988df18a8011f41eacad73 |
| USDG | $1.000 | $107.06M | $58.09M | 439.5K | 115d | 0x5fc5360d0400a0fd4f2af552add042d716f1d168 |
| PONS | $0.2389 | $5.57M | $4.69M | 103.4K | 75d | 0x39dbed3a2bd333467115de45665cc57f813c4571 |
| QQQ | $704.44 | $3.60M | $1.03M | 29.0K | 43d | 0xd5f3879160bc7c32ebb4dc785f8a4f505888de68 |
| NMS | $0.0002901 | $1.99M | $72.6K | 934 | 6h | 0xbf6bd9aa3e6a5ddac553527dec7e671ac0f41e18 |
New tokens with liquidity (≤24h old)
Five non-scam screened tokens launched in the last 24 hours meet the criteria of having at least $10,000 in liquidity [1]. Several originate from launchpad contracts (such as 'pons' and 'Flywheel') and trade via Uniswap [1].
| Token | Contract | Liquidity | 24h Vol | Holders | Age | Launchpad | Top 10 % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NMS | 0xfcca112411268fc28c2c5acbf633c745803040a4 | $16.7K | $2.47M | 720 | 6h | pons (graduated) | 20% |
| NMS | 0xbf6bd9aa3e6a5ddac553527dec7e671ac0f41e18 | $72.6K | $1.99M | 934 | 6h | LONG | 18% |
| ETH | 0xc6d0a987c6839d08516bcd27ad89b3bcc8bbaac1 | $29.9K | $644.5K | 556 | 7h | Flywheel (graduated) | 15% |
| GFG | 0x8945bb57bcc198904e258e75d019634460f3d836 | $23.1K | $618.2K | 603 | 14h | - | 43% |
| SIL | 0xba729677349f41fa082bbd50f3c291a3b4b41111 | $37.1K | $180.8K | 239 | 3h | - | 25% |
Important risks
Automated security screens indicate that no flags were found for the screened tokens, but screens are filters rather than safety guarantees [1, 2].
Tokens with identical tickers exist simultaneously on the network (e.g., two distinct 'NMS' contracts created 6 hours ago with different contract addresses, launch platforms, and liquidity pools) [1].
Concentration risk is present among newer and mid-cap tokens: GFG top 10 holders control 43% of supply with 10% sniper allocation and 7% dev holding [1]; SIL has 8% insider allocation [1]; and RAREFRIENDS displays a 54.9% insider share with 60.2% top-10 concentration [2].
Extreme turnover-to-liquidity ratios are present on newly created pairs: the 0xfcca NMS pool processed $2.47M in volume against only $16.7K in liquidity over 6 hours [1].
Sources
- 01DeFi protocols (Robinhood Chain)via DefiLlama
- 02Market overview (Robinhood Chain)via DefiLlama + CoinGecko + Codex